Asus RAMPAGE IV GENE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics49% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE IV GENE  (all builds)
Memory15.1 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1842 x 1036 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140515
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateOct 05 '21 at 08:51
Run Duration216 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3820
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
73.6% Very good
Memory 83.4
1-Core 69.3
2-Core 198
66% 117 Pts
4-Core 345
8-Core 499
53% 422 Pts
64-Core 506
31% 506 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-$329
MSI(1462 2980) 3GB
CLim: 1374 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
49% Average
Lighting 55.3
Reflection 72.2
Parallax 70.2
45% 65.9 fps
MRender 80.1
Gravity 71.5
Splatting 59.8
56% 70.5 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 49%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 583ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 75 85 93 89 78 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
42.1% Average
Read 246
Write 120
Mixed 158
SusWrite 83.8
34% 152 MB/s
4K Read 11.1
4K Write 40.2
4K Mixed 25.1
70% 25.5 MB/s
DQ Read 83.6
DQ Write 120
DQ Mixed 96.3
74% 100 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 73%
WD Blue 500GB (2007)-$150
64GB free
Firmware: 12.01C01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 77 79 77 79 78 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
40.1% Average
Read 61.7
Write 50.3
Mixed 44.4
SusWrite 77.8
43% 58.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 51%
WD WD3000HLHX-01JJPV0 300GB
113GB free
Firmware: 04.05G04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 105 106 106 105 105 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
62.4% Good
Read 112
Write 106
Mixed 79.1
SusWrite 105
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.2
231% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 79%
Hitachi HUA721010KLA330 1TB-$38
71GB free
Firmware: GKAOA70M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 78 80 81 80 80 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
38.3% Below average
Read 53.4
Write 60.6
Mixed 34.5
SusWrite 79.7
42% 57 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
167% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 46%
Seagate Expansion Desk 3TB
337GB free
Firmware: 0911
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 29 29 29 29 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
18.1% Very poor
Read 33.3
Write 28.4
Mixed 24.6
SusWrite 29
21% 28.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G KHX1600C10D3/8G F3-10666CL8-2GBXM F3-10666CL8-2GBXM 20GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.6% Average
MC Read 18.8
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 15.9
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 11.5
SC Mixed 10.7
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 74.4
54% 74.4 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 19: 1R 3G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
19% 23% 39 301 223 60 72.3" 1474 829 SNYF500 SONY TV
Typical RAMPAGE IV GENE Builds (Compare 254 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE IV GENE - $594

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $790
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback