Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.52% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive91.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201014
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 10 '21 at 12:35
Run Duration200 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 3000G Vega Graphics
AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Memory 67.6
1-Core 91.9
2-Core 149
60% 103 Pts
4-Core 294
8-Core 273
38% 284 Pts
64-Core 290
18% 290 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 3 (Ryzen iGPU)
Asus(1043 876B) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.8.2
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
5.52% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 9
Parallax 7.8
5% 7.47 fps
MRender 9
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 11.4
7% 8.7 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.52%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Afox SD250-240GN 240GB
182GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0326A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 403 411 410 423 427 275 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 419
Mixed 411
SusWrite 392
96% 428 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 83.4
4K Mixed 21.8
120% 45.6 MB/s
DQ Read 242
DQ Write 329
DQ Mixed 32.6
95% 201 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 91%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$35
466GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 112 115 117 118 118 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
65.3% Good
Read 112
Write 112
Mixed 63.9
SusWrite 115
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1.1
185% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
MAXSUN MSD48G26Q3 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
85.2% Excellent
MC Read 34.3
MC Write 32.7
MC Mixed 29
91% 32 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 20.8
62% 21.6 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,595 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $72

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $316
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $270WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback