Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345 17,464 User benchmarks, average bench 70% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	76.9% Very good	Memory 85 1-Core 97.2 2-Core 174 70% 119 Pts	4-Core 380 8-Core 490 56% 435 Pts	64-Core 494 30% 494 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 76.9% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% MSI(1462 8C93) 1GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	3.4% Terrible	Lighting 4.1 Reflection 3.9 Parallax 4.3 3% 4.1 fps	MRender 3.7 Gravity 3.9 Splatting 5 4% 4.2 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.4% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Patriot Burst 240GB 26,886 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 93GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM21.1 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 387 Write 74.5 Mixed 194 48% 218 MB/s	4K Read 21.6 4K Write 58 4K Mixed 13.4 81% 31 MB/s	DQ Read 41.8 DQ Write 231 DQ Mixed 39.9 59% 104 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 94%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung-00CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 2x8GB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	50.3% Above average	MC Read 19.2 MC Write 17.2 MC Mixed 16.6 50% 17.7 GB/s	SC Read 13.9 SC Write 13.8 SC Mixed 12.2 38% 13.3 GB/s	Latency 71.9 56% 71.9 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 50.3% Great: 50%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

RAM
M393B5273DH0-CK0 4x4GBSamsung-00CEBench 85%, 1,049 samples	147x
HMT351R7CFR8C-PB 4x4GBHynix-00ADBench 83%, 808 samples	130x
HMT31GR7CFR4C-PB 4x8GBHynix-00ADBench 78%, 761 samples	74x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $373

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16