Today's hottest deals

Acer Veriton M200-H61

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.79% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive36.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Veriton M200-H61  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer H61H2-M6
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20130718
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 11 '21 at 16:01
Run Duration219 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3240
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
62% Good
Memory 83.6
1-Core 92.5
2-Core 171
68% 116 Pts
4-Core 236
8-Core 235
32% 235 Pts
64-Core 223
14% 223 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 62%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Gigabyte(1458 3693) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
6.79% Terrible
Lighting 8.4
Reflection 11.4
Parallax 9.4
7% 9.73 fps
MRender 10.6
Gravity 7.4
Splatting 7.1
7% 8.37 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.79%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$32
183GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF220400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 98 123 123 136 150 MB/s
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.2% Below average
Read 232
Write 215
Mixed 190
SusWrite 137
43% 194 MB/s
4K Read 13.9
4K Write 28
4K Mixed 10.6
50% 17.5 MB/s
DQ Read 74
DQ Write 96.3
DQ Mixed 31.9
39% 67.4 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 55%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$37
167GB free
Firmware: 17.01H17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 115 114 116 116 115 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
64.6% Good
Read 110
Write 110
Mixed 68.5
SusWrite 115
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 69%
WD Elements 1078 2TB
564GB free, PID 1078
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 25 25 25 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Read 26.1
Write 20.4
Mixed 20.9
SusWrite 25.1
31% 23.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LU1KBG/4G 830B NT4GC64B88B0NF-DI 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.6% Average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 16.6
48% 17 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 15.6
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 74.1
54% 74.1 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Veriton M200-H61 Builds (Compare 36 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Veriton M200-H61

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback