Supermicro SYS-7049GP-TRT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive315% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory512GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 512GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSupermicro SYS-7049GP-TRT  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X11DPG-QT
Memory95.7 GB free of 512 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200221
Uptime7.4 Days
Run DateOct 12 '21 at 13:54
Run Duration532 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 6246R
CPU1, 2 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
78.5% Very good
Memory 63.8
1-Core 128
2-Core 256
79% 150 Pts
4-Core 498
8-Core 983
88% 740 Pts
64-Core 4,947
306% 4,947 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 90%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$158
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1703 1662 1678 1683 1664 1672 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
315% Outstanding
Read 2,183
Write 1,855
Mixed 1,607
SusWrite 1,677
411% 1,831 MB/s
4K Read 58.3
4K Write 155
4K Mixed 82.4
276% 98.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,032
DQ Write 763
DQ Mixed 886
665% 893 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 315%
Great: 435%
Avago MR9361-8i 30TB
7TB free
Firmware: 4.68
SusWrite @10s intervals: 515 500 497 498 497 494 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
WDC WDS200T2B0C-00PXH0 2TB
6TB free
Firmware: 21705000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3665 3709 3673 2890 2770 2785 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
469% Outstanding
Read 3,817
Write 3,400
Mixed 2,224
SusWrite 3,249
712% 3,172 MB/s
4K Read 47.9
4K Write 177
4K Mixed 68.5
254% 97.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,090
DQ Write 738
DQ Mixed 936
692% 921 MB/s
Poor: 158%
This bench: 469%
Great: 283%
WDC WDS200T2B0C-00PXH0 2TB
4TB free
Firmware: 21705000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3621 3664 3653 2902 2770 2775 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
461% Outstanding
Read 3,728
Write 3,286
Mixed 2,092
SusWrite 3,231
692% 3,084 MB/s
4K Read 45.7
4K Write 157
4K Mixed 66.7
238% 89.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,095
DQ Write 749
DQ Mixed 950
701% 931 MB/s
Poor: 158%
This bench: 461%
Great: 283%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$158
671GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2351 2381 2361 1735 1322 1343 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
349% Outstanding
Read 2,418
Write 2,329
Mixed 1,851
SusWrite 1,916
479% 2,128 MB/s
4K Read 59.8
4K Write 181
4K Mixed 82.8
293% 108 MB/s
DQ Read 1,159
DQ Write 878
DQ Mixed 1,007
756% 1,015 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 349%
Great: 435%
Avago MR9361-8i 20TB
15TB free
Firmware: 4.68
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,876
Write 2,345
Mixed 2116
474% 2,112 MB/s
4K Read 111
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 112
372% 112 MB/s
DQ Read 498
DQ Write 474
DQ Mixed 464
354% 479 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A8G40MB2-CVF 8x31.9GB
8 of 16 slots used
255GB DIMM DDR4 2933 MHz clocked @ 2934 MHz
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
78% Very good
MC Read 34.7
MC Write 27.9
MC Mixed 31.7
90% 31.4 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 7.3
28% 9.73 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 78%
Great: 224%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SYS-7049GP-TRT Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 141%
UFO

System: Supermicro SYS-7049GP-TRT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 146% - Outstanding Total price: $158
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback