Asus X99-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics27.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus X99-PRO  (all builds)
Memory32.1 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140923
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateOct 14 '21 at 15:49
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Memory 88.5
1-Core 99.7
2-Core 165
71% 118 Pts
4-Core 361
8-Core 604
59% 482 Pts
64-Core 733
45% 733 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K5200
Nvidia(10DE 1095) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27.9% Poor
Lighting 29.7
Reflection 49.9
Parallax 40.2
24% 39.9 fps
MRender 52.8
Gravity 42.9
Splatting 36.5
35% 44.1 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 34%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 35 34 34 36 37 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$71
341GB free
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 433 348 283 282 276 285 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
99% Outstanding
Read 487
Write 460
Mixed 435
SusWrite 318
96% 425 MB/s
4K Read 42
4K Write 86.5
4K Mixed 54.7
180% 61.1 MB/s
DQ Read 49.9
DQ Write 123
DQ Mixed 68.6
57% 80.5 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 99%
Great: 130%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
1TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 38 38 37 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Read 14.2
Write 45.2
Mixed 38.2
SusWrite 38.4
25% 34 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.3
59% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 90%
WD My Passport 25E1 2TB
797GB free, PID 25e1
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 27 26 26 27 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
9.95% Terrible
Read 13.5
Write 14.5
Mixed 12
SusWrite 26.7
24% 16.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.2
31% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 9.95%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair ValueSelect DDR4 2133 C15 6x8GB
6 of 8 slots used
48GB DIMM clocked @ 2133 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
84.1% Excellent
MC Read 36.2
MC Write 29.6
MC Mixed 29.3
91% 31.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 19.8
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 69
58% 69 ns
Poor: 84%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-PRO Builds (Compare 371 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-PRO - $320

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $1,104
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback