Monster ABRA A5 V13.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics28.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMonster ABRA A5 V13.1  (all builds)
MotherboardStandard Standard
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190123
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 14 '21 at 18:50
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Memory 93.9
1-Core 121
2-Core 210
82% 142 Pts
4-Core 468
8-Core 550
66% 509 Pts
64-Core 589
36% 589 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)
Device(1D05 1042) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6242
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.4% Poor
Lighting 40.7
Reflection 42
Parallax 38.9
33% 40.5 fps
MRender 38.6
Gravity 41.6
Splatting 0.1
19% 26.8 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 31%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 240GB
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 298 27 17 79 246 60 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
71.7% Very good
Read 774
Write 428
Mixed 401
SusWrite 121
95% 431 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 44.4
4K Mixed 17.4
85% 29.2 MB/s
DQ Read 236
DQ Write 130
DQ Mixed 82.7
88% 150 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43BB1-CRC 0908 TXRUI D48GB-2400 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
79.6% Very good
MC Read 30.9
MC Write 30.3
MC Mixed 22.5
80% 27.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 32.6
SC Mixed 24.3
70% 24.7 GB/s
Latency 59.9
67% 59.9 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ABRA A5 V13.1 Builds (Compare 337 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Monster ABRA A5 V13.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback