HP EliteBook 8570w

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.61% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive94.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP EliteBook 8570w  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 176B
Memory13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190419
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 14 '21 at 19:26
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3740QM-$220
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
69.4% Good
Memory 75.1
1-Core 98.4
2-Core 194
69% 123 Pts
4-Core 344
8-Core 491
52% 418 Pts
64-Core 493
30% 493 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2000M
HP(103C 176B) 2GB
CLim: 745 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 385.73
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
5.61% Terrible
Lighting 6.7
Reflection 7.4
Parallax 8.1
6% 7.4 fps
MRender 8
Gravity 6.2
Splatting 7.4
6% 7.2 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.61%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$48
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 420 417 421 408 422 425 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
Read 428
Write 417
Mixed 416
SusWrite 419
95% 420 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 52.4
4K Mixed 34.6
114% 38.2 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 349
DQ Mixed 294
240% 340 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 125%
Adata DashDrive UV150 USB 3.0 16GB-$39
9GB free, PID dc1a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 10 11 10 10 10 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Read 32.3
Write 9.3
Mixed 19.5
SusWrite 10.4
21% 17.9 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
61% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 29%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ40UG8EFU0-GN-F Hynix HMT351S6EFR8A-PB EBJ40UG8EFU0-GN-F Hynix HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
53.2% Above average
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 19
MC Mixed 16.7
52% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 18.8
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 90.1
44% 90.1 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 8570w Builds (Compare 905 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8570w

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback