Today's hottest deals

Apple MacBookPro14,2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics112% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemApple MacBookPro14,2  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-CAD6701F7CEA0921
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210613
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 14 '21 at 20:25
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7267U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Memory 71
1-Core 111
2-Core 184
70% 122 Pts
4-Core 277
8-Core 288
38% 283 Pts
64-Core 290
18% 290 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$237
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.7111
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
112% Outstanding
Lighting 155
Reflection 136
Parallax 144
126% 145 fps
MRender 105
Gravity 139
Splatting 99.4
93% 115 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 112%
Great: 133%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black 2.5" 750GB (2011)-$87
100GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 85 88 82 86 86 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
49.7% Average
Read 88.5
Write 89.9
Mixed 54.1
SusWrite 84.5
58% 79.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x483943434E4E4E434C47414C41522D4E5644 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM LPDDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
88.2% Excellent
MC Read 27.1
MC Write 49.6
MC Mixed 22.8
95% 33.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 31.6
SC Mixed 19.8
63% 22 GB/s
Latency 99
40% 99 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacBookPro14,2 Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Apple MacBookPro14,2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback