Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 36% Jet ski	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Packard EasyNote TM86 (all builds)
Motherboard	Packard EasyNote TM86
Memory	2.8 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100406
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 14 '21 at 23:03
Run Duration	186 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 M 330 14,119 User benchmarks, average bench 38% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	37.6% Below average	Memory 59 1-Core 34.5 2-Core 66.5 35% 53.3 Pts	4-Core 93.3 8-Core 109 13% 101 Pts	64-Core 103 6% 103 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 37.6% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 320M 1,680 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 036D) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.18% Terrible	Lighting 1.3 Reflection 2.1 Parallax 0.5 1% 1.3 fps	MRender 3.5 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 1.4 1% 1.8 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.18% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
INTENSO 128GB 3,345 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 61GB free (System drive) Firmware: U0312A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 160 198 198 205 200 MB/s Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	37.9% Below average	Read 180 Write 157 Mixed 159 SusWrite 186 38% 170 MB/s	4K Read 13.2 4K Write 28 4K Mixed 9 46% 16.7 MB/s	DQ Read 133 DQ Write 123 DQ Mixed 39.9 54% 98.5 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 37.9% Great: 91%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown Elpida EBJ21UE8BDS0-AE-F 6GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1067, 1067 MHz 4096, 2048 MB Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	20.5% Poor	MC Read 7.4 MC Write 6.1 MC Mixed 7.6 20% 7.03 GB/s	SC Read 5.5 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 4.8 14% 5.03 GB/s	Latency 131 31% 131 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 20.5% Great: 38%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
GeForce GT 320MNvidiaBench 1%, 1,680 samples	18x
Mobility Radeon HD 5470ATIBench 1%, 14,621 samples	2x
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	2x

RAM
EBJ21UE8BDS0-AE-F 2x2GBElpidaBench 26%, 802 samples	4x
M471B5673EH1-CF8 2x2GBSamsungBench 25%, 2,358 samples	2x
HMT125S6TFR8C-H9 2x2GBHynixBench 29%, 1,376 samples	2x