Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 90DA00L7US

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics25.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (82%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemLenovo 90DA00L7US  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 30C7
Memory9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170309
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 15 '21 at 00:37
Run Duration213 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 82%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$69
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
73.2% Very good
Memory 84.2
1-Core 92.1
2-Core 190
70% 122 Pts
4-Core 362
8-Core 347
48% 354 Pts
64-Core 367
23% 367 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$91
HP(103C 8338) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 496.13
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.4% Poor
Lighting 31.7
Reflection 31.7
Parallax 31.4
26% 31.6 fps
MRender 37.4
Gravity 32.6
Splatting 22.9
24% 31 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TY256HDHP-000L1 256GB
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT04L0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 44 44 43 41 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
60.2% Good
Read 433
Write 405
Mixed 297
SusWrite 66.2
67% 300 MB/s
4K Read 15.9
4K Write 39
4K Mixed 24.3
76% 26.4 MB/s
DQ Read 360
DQ Write 313
DQ Mixed 312
240% 328 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 113%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$70
745GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 97 96 96 97 97 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Read 105
Write 91.5
Mixed 66.3
SusWrite 95.8
66% 89.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
125% 1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 57%
Seagate Backup+ BL 1TB
546GB free, PID a013
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 37 37 37 37 37 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
18.2% Very poor
Read 35.7
Write 35.8
Mixed 30.9
SusWrite 36.6
47% 34.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 0423 TEAMGROUP-UD4-2133 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
65.7% Good
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 24.2
MC Mixed 20.5
67% 23.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 23.6
SC Mixed 19.2
54% 19 GB/s
Latency 73
55% 73 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 90DA00L7US Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 90DA00L7US

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $69
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback