Today's hottest deals

Apple Macmini7,1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemApple Macmini7,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-35C5E08120C7EEAF
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190722
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 15 '21 at 03:39
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4260U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
53.9% Above average
Memory 76.2
1-Core 79.5
2-Core 127
58% 94.1 Pts
4-Core 185
8-Core 188
25% 186 Pts
64-Core 190
12% 190 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5000 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Apple(106B 0141) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
4.69% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 3
Parallax 9.3
5% 6.07 fps
MRender 6.1
Gravity 3.8
Splatting 6.2
4% 5.37 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.69%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$23
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR052
SusWrite @10s intervals: 330 351 368 183 113 157 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
53% Above average
Read 406
Write 347
Mixed 58.3
SusWrite 250
59% 266 MB/s
4K Read 11.4
4K Write 21.5
4K Mixed 6.9
38% 13.3 MB/s
DQ Read 148
DQ Write 329
DQ Mixed 1.2
68% 159 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 53%
Great: 92%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB
3GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.3 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
10.1% Very poor
Read 17.2
Write 3.5
Mixed 7.6
SusWrite 4.3
9% 8.15 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 2.5
163% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 13%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
14GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 3.4 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
4.36% Terrible
Read 10.8
Write 1.8
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 3.4
6% 5.05 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.6
47% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.36%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x483943434E4E4E384A54424C41522D4E5444 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
52.6% Above average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 17.7
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 16
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 87.9
46% 87.9 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Macmini7,1 Builds (Compare 158 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Apple Macmini7,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback