Asus P8H61-I

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics36.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8H61-I  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121204
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateOct 15 '21 at 06:08
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3330
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Memory 92.1
1-Core 84.7
2-Core 167
69% 115 Pts
4-Core 309
8-Core 317
42% 313 Pts
64-Core 311
19% 311 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 496.13
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
36.5% Below average
Lighting 47.4
Reflection 48.6
Parallax 43.2
39% 46.4 fps
MRender 36.8
Gravity 43.7
Splatting 37.9
32% 39.5 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 120GB-$20
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900612
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 75 61 70 75 61 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
33.9% Below average
Read 184
Write 127
Mixed 124
SusWrite 78.9
29% 129 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 28.8
4K Mixed 16.5
68% 21.9 MB/s
DQ Read 18.9
DQ Write 35.3
DQ Mixed 22.9
19% 25.7 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 87%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
895GB free
Firmware: 2BA30001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 95 93 96 96 96 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
56.9% Above average
Read 103
Write 104
Mixed 54.7
SusWrite 95.1
65% 89.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
165% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GU6AFR8A-PB 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
58.1% Above average
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 17.8
58% 20.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 16.1
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 63.8
63% 63.8 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H61-I Builds (Compare 149 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-I

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback