Gigabyte GA-X99-SLI-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics56.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X99-SLI-CF  (all builds)
Memory29.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150415
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 16 '21 at 02:31
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5930K-$143
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Memory 84.6
1-Core 109
2-Core 197
75% 130 Pts
4-Core 411
8-Core 656
66% 534 Pts
64-Core 859
53% 859 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan X-$615
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 496.13
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56.7% Above average
Lighting 91.9
Reflection 93.2
Parallax 29.2
75% 71.4 fps
MRender 30
Gravity 33.2
Splatting 18.4
21% 27.2 fps
Poor: 68%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 83%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk S064G 63GB
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.2.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 374
Write 144
Mixed 92.1
44% 203 MB/s
4K Read 14.3
4K Write 10.2
4K Mixed 10.4
40% 11.6 MB/s
DQ Read 32.3
DQ Write 11.4
DQ Mixed 13
12% 18.9 MB/s
Poor: 28% Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR4 2400 2OZ 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 42.1
MC Write 43
MC Mixed 39.8
119% 41.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 20.3
54% 18.7 GB/s
Latency 72.5
55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 107%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X99-SLI-CF Builds (Compare 389 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X99-SLI-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $839
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback