IBM 2529FBG

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive31.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemIBM 2529FBG  (all builds)
MotherboardIBM 2529FBG
Memory1.1 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20070227
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 19 '17 at 18:25
Run Duration332 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium M processor 1.86GHz-$49
None, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 1.85 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
33% Below average
Memory 63.6
1-Core 18.4
2-Core 18.4
28% 33.5 Pts
4-Core 18.4
8-Core 18
2% 18.2 Pts
64-Core 16.7
1% 16.7 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 33%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TD256HAFV-000L7 256GB
152GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT06L6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31.2% Below average
Read 126
Write 121
Mixed 121
27% 123 MB/s
4K Read 18.2
4K Write 32.8
4K Mixed 11.3
59% 20.8 MB/s
DQ Read 20.1
DQ Write 34.8
DQ Mixed 10.4
13% 21.7 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 80%
Generic SDC SD Card 32GB
6GB free
Firmware: 0.0
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
2.73% Terrible
Read 3.2
Write 5.8
Mixed 4.05
3% 4.35 MB/s
4K Read 1.61
4K Write 0.01
4K Mixed 0.005
68% 0.54 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.73%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
10.2% Very poor
MC Read 3.4
MC Write 2.6
MC Mixed 2.3
8% 2.77 GB/s
SC Read 3.3
SC Write 3
SC Mixed 2.7
9% 3 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback