Today's hottest deals

Toshiba SATELLITE C670-14K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.33% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemToshiba SATELLITE C670-14K  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel Oneonta Falls
Memory0.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110512
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateOct 16 '21 at 22:42
Run Duration219 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2410M-$160
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
56.9% Above average
Memory 84.6
1-Core 65
2-Core 97.7
54% 82.4 Pts
4-Core 173
8-Core 167
23% 170 Pts
64-Core 174
11% 174 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 315M
Toshiba(1179 FC61) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.33% Terrible
Lighting 1.6
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 0.3
1% 1.2 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.7
1% 1.7 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.33%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MK6465GSX 640GB
373GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GJ003M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 31 35 40 37 35 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
16.8% Very poor
Read 24.1
Write 27.6
Mixed 24.6
SusWrite 34.2
20% 27.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.3
66% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR256X64D3S1333C9 80CE M471B5673EH1-CH9 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.5% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 16.3
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 13.2
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 72.5
55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SATELLITE C670-14K Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Toshiba SATELLITE C670-14K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $160
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback