Biostar TZ77XE3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics54.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardBiostar TZ77XE3  (all builds)
Memory25.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120419
Uptime3.6 Days
Run DateOct 17 '21 at 01:18
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3220-$60
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Memory 76
1-Core 89.5
2-Core 137
61% 101 Pts
4-Core 230
8-Core 227
31% 228 Pts
64-Core 230
14% 230 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
54.3% Above average
Lighting 65.7
Reflection 95
Parallax 57
54% 72.6 fps
MRender 63
Gravity 72.3
Splatting 68.1
56% 67.8 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 60%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$66
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.2 5.5 6.6 6.3 6.2 5.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
20% Poor
Read 63.6
Write 5.5
Mixed 9.7
SusWrite 6.1
16% 21.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.4
77% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 20%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-547.A00LF 9905403-558.A00LF 9905403-547.A00LF 9905403-558.A00LF 32GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.7% Above average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 16.5
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 16.8
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 88.4
45% 88.4 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TZ77XE3 Builds (Compare 83 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Biostar TZ77XE3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $328
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback