Gigabyte GA-78LMT-S2P

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 20%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-78LMT-S2P  (all builds)
Memory0.4 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121018
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 20 '17 at 07:05
Run Duration294 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 270-$20
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
41.1% Average
Memory 67.7
1-Core 46.4
2-Core 93.1
44% 69.1 Pts
4-Core 86.8
8-Core 89.5
12% 88.2 Pts
64-Core 79.5
5% 79.5 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5500
XFX(1682 3058) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
2.98% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 4.62
Parallax 3.28
3% 3.83 fps
MRender 3.76
Gravity 3.03
Splatting 4.22
3% 3.67 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.98%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Virtual Disk 80GB
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
6.66% Terrible
Read 10.6
Write 10.4
Mixed 10.2
8% 10.4 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 3.75
4K Mixed 1.9
406% 2.88 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.66%
Great: 40%
Virtual Disk 500GB
12GB free
Firmware: 0
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
5.02% Terrible
Read 8.7
Write 8.31
Mixed 7.7
6% 8.24 MB/s
4K Read 0.02
4K Write 1.64
4K Mixed 0.17
50% 0.61 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.02%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
21.1% Poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 6
20% 6.9 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 5.2
16% 5.67 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-78LMT-S2P Builds (Compare 478 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-78LMT-S2P - $260

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $378
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $419
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback