Advent Modena M201 Blue

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAdvent Modena M201 Blue  (all builds)
MotherboardAdvent Modena M201 Blue
Memory1.4 GB free of 3 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100924
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateOct 20 '21 at 18:48
Run Duration9181 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3500
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
38.6% Below average
Memory 67.5
1-Core 30
2-Core 59.9
36% 52.5 Pts
4-Core 59.6
8-Core 59.1
8% 59.3 Pts
64-Core 59.8
4% 59.8 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family
Device(1297 2000)
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.22% Terrible
Lighting 0.4
Reflection 0.5
Parallax 0.3
0% 0.4 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.22%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MK3265GSX 320GB-$91
201GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GJ003A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 53 51 56 48 47 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
31.1% Below average
Read 57.6
Write 56.5
Mixed 23.5
SusWrite 50.6
34% 47.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
98% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SSZ3128M8-EDJ1D SSY3128M8-EDJ1D 3GB
0, 0 MHz
2048, 1024 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
14.8% Very poor
MC Read 5.3
MC Write 3.8
MC Mixed 3.9
12% 4.33 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 4.4
13% 4.6 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 15%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Modena M201 Blue Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Advent Modena M201 Blue

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback