Pcsmart O.E.M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardPcsmart O.E.M  (all builds)
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100623
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateOct 23 '21 at 23:17
Run Duration273 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E7500-$109
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
41.1% Average
Memory 70.1
1-Core 41.2
2-Core 79.6
42% 63.6 Pts
4-Core 74.5
8-Core 72.1
10% 73.3 Pts
64-Core 56.6
4% 56.6 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
MSI(1462 8C93) 1GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.4% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 5.5
Parallax 3.9
3% 4.47 fps
MRender 4.3
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 5
4% 4.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.4%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32
196GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AM001U
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 43 15 6.2 4.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
30.8% Below average
Read 90.5
Write 94
Mixed 32.8
SusWrite 16.4
43% 58.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
98% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 60%
Samsung HD160JJ 160GB-$85
116GB free
Firmware: ZM100-47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 57 58 58 58 58 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
33.2% Below average
Read 57.5
Write 63.5
Mixed 39.5
SusWrite 58
40% 54.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
17.1% Very poor
MC Read 6.6
MC Write 5.1
MC Mixed 5
16% 5.57 GB/s
SC Read 1.2
SC Write 3.8
SC Mixed 5.2
10% 3.4 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical O.E.M Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Pcsmart O.E.M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback