Positivo A1600R / A1700R

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (95th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 5 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
CPU throttled at 95% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemPositivo A1600R / A1700R  (all builds)
MotherboardPositivo A1600R / A1700R
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180430
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 24 '21 at 10:24
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User RWA-User
Background CPU2%
CPU Throttled 95%

 PC Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
63% Good
Memory 87.8
1-Core 88
2-Core 154
67% 110 Pts
4-Core 224
8-Core 226
30% 225 Pts
64-Core 226
14% 226 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 63%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Device(1297 2058) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7212
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
4.88% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 2.3
Parallax 6.2
5% 4.7 fps
MRender 4.3
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 9
6% 6.33 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.88%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZYTY256HDHP-000L2 256GB
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT61L1Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 468
Write 416
Mixed 273
86% 386 MB/s
4K Read 39.6
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 51.2
179% 64 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 322
251% 344 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 111%
Generic External 1TB
112GB free, PID 0840
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 36 39 36 38 38 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
26.7% Poor
Read 37.2
Write 35.8
Mixed 26.5
SusWrite 36.6
46% 34 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.3
159% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 29%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TI9D3S05H41160 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
34% Below average
MC Read 11.5
MC Write 11.6
MC Mixed 10.2
32% 11.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 8.5
28% 9.93 GB/s
Latency 69.8
57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 34%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A1600R / A1700R Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Positivo A1600R / A1700R

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 20% - Very poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback