Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	64.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52 79,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	57.3% Above average	Memory 80 1-Core 82.7 2-Core 145 62% 103 Pts	4-Core 203 8-Core 203 27% 203 Pts	64-Core 202 12% 202 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 57.3% Great: 57%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Lexar 256GB SSD 256GB 12,615 User benchmarks, average bench 111% 216GB free (System drive) Firmware: H190117D SusWrite @10s intervals: 335 333 332 320 329 264 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	64.4% Good	Read 347 Write 323 Mixed 304 SusWrite 319 73% 323 MB/s	4K Read 27.1 4K Write 37.3 4K Mixed 26.5 95% 30.3 MB/s	DQ Read 30.2 DQ Write 49 DQ Mixed 32.8 27% 37.3 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 64.4% Great: 240%
Imation Classic 8GB 204 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 4GB free, PID 070c Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.6 3.7 4 4.1 3.7 4 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	4.62% Terrible	Read 19.3 Write 10.5 Mixed 9.3 SusWrite 3.7 13% 10.7 MB/s	4K Read 4.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 16% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.62% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Elpida EBJ20UF8BCS0-DJ-F Adata AD73I1C1674EV 6GB 52 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	47.9% Average	MC Read 16.9 MC Write 17.2 MC Mixed 15.5 47% 16.5 GB/s	SC Read 14.2 SC Write 14.7 SC Mixed 14.6 41% 14.5 GB/s	Latency 80.6 50% 80.6 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 47.9% Great: 48%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	984x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	62x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	43x

RAM
HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 27%, 17,632 samples	43x
HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 28%, 12,200 samples	27x
16KTF51264HZ-1G6M1 1x4GBMicronBench 27%, 6,018 samples	27x

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $128

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16