Asrock Z68 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics87% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive25.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock Z68 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors, 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110518
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateAug 22 '17 at 00:06
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Memory 92.5
1-Core 117
2-Core 234
84% 148 Pts
4-Core 437
8-Core 439
59% 438 Pts
64-Core 447
28% 447 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 382.53
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
87% Excellent
Lighting 111
Reflection 115
Parallax 105
90% 110 fps
MRender 95.6
Gravity 102
Splatting 98
81% 98.6 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 87%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 960GB-$100
551GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41100RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
25.2% Poor
Read 162
Write 65.9
Mixed 83.8
23% 104 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 19.1
4K Mixed 7.97
47% 14.9 MB/s
DQ Read 19.6
DQ Write 25.7
DQ Mixed 7.87
10% 17.7 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 107%
Crucial MX100 512GB-$200
96GB free
Firmware: MU01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
62.6% Good
Read 298
Write 362
Mixed 312
73% 324 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 75.3
4K Mixed 15.8
91% 37.1 MB/s
DQ Read 23.1
DQ Write 68.2
DQ Mixed 17.8
22% 36.4 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 107%
Samsung 840 Evo 750GB-$310
93GB free
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40% Below average
Read 204
Write 149
Mixed 135
36% 163 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 31
4K Mixed 13.4
72% 23.4 MB/s
DQ Read 28.9
DQ Write 32.7
DQ Mixed 13.7
15% 25.1 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 40%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 64C0MHHHJ-HS 64C0MHHHJ-HS 64C0MHHHJ-HS 64C0MHHHJ-HS 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
49.6% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 15.6
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 15.7
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 63.1
63% 63.1 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z68 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 185 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock Z68 Extreme4 - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $628
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback