Today's hottest deals

Biostar A68N-5745

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics7.61% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive31.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardBiostar A68N-5745  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161109
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 26 '21 at 15:25
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-5745M APU
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
35.4% Below average
Memory 52.5
1-Core 43.9
2-Core 77.9
36% 58.1 Pts
4-Core 107
8-Core 110
14% 108 Pts
64-Core 117
7% 117 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7750
PwrHis(1787 2014) 1GB
CLim: 800 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
7.61% Terrible
Lighting 8.8
Reflection 15.5
Parallax 14.2
7% 12.8 fps
MRender 11.8
Gravity 9.6
Splatting 9.9
8% 10.4 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.61%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2016)-$84
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z3311000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 76 73 77 86 73 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31.8% Below average
Read 143
Write 157
Mixed 156
SusWrite 80.9
30% 134 MB/s
4K Read 18
4K Write 37.6
4K Mixed 2.3
50% 19.3 MB/s
DQ Read 153
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 33.1
62% 123 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron I9E5403-02X.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
19.1% Very poor
MC Read 6.9
MC Write 4.5
MC Mixed 8.2
19% 6.53 GB/s
SC Read 5.6
SC Write 3.3
SC Mixed 6.5
15% 5.13 GB/s
Latency 152
26% 152 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A68N-5745 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar A68N-5745

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 4% - Terrible Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback