Lenovo 10A90014US

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics1.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 10A90014US  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO SHARKBAY
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141022
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 27 '21 at 02:17
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$75
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Memory 81.8
1-Core 112
2-Core 226
78% 140 Pts
4-Core 427
8-Core 588
64% 508 Pts
64-Core 581
36% 581 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 620
MSI(1462 259D) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 448 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.73
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.96% Terrible
Lighting 2.3
Reflection 3.3
Parallax 0.8
2% 2.13 fps
MRender 3.2
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 2.3
2% 2.67 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.96%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
835GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 55 156 150 159 100 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
79.3% Very good
Read 155
Write 126
Mixed 65
SusWrite 121
85% 117 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
211% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73QH0-CK0 1438 TIMETEC-UD3-1600 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
58.4% Above average
MC Read 21.8
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 17.3
58% 20.1 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 20.3
55% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 77.2
52% 77.2 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 10A90014US Builds (Compare 47 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 10A90014US

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $155
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback