Today's hottest deals

Samsung 355V4C/356V4C/3445VC/3545VC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 84% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemSamsung 355V4C/356V4C/3445VC/3545VC  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP355V5C-S0ATR
Memory2.7 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130704
Uptime127.6 Days
Run DateOct 27 '21 at 14:23
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 17%
CPU Throttled 84%

 PC Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-4500M APU
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
28.9% Poor
Memory 43.6
1-Core 27.7
2-Core 47.7
26% 39.7 Pts
4-Core 83
8-Core 85.5
11% 84.2 Pts
64-Core 83.2
5% 83.2 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7640G
Sanyo(144D C0DA) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
1.95% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 4.2
Parallax 2.1
2% 2.8 fps
MRender 3.2
Gravity 2
Splatting 3.5
2% 2.9 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.95%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS547550A9E384 500GB-$60
415GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JE3OA50A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 48 50 54 40 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
17.2% Very poor
Read 15.8
Write 39.7
Mixed 14.2
SusWrite 44
21% 28.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.2
39% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CK0 M471B5773EB0-CK0 6GB
800, 800 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
15.3% Very poor
MC Read 6.6
MC Write 3.6
MC Mixed 5.3
15% 5.17 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 5
12% 4.37 GB/s
Latency 186
22% 186 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 355V4C/356V4C/3445VC/3545VC Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 355V4C/356V4C/3445VC/3545VC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $23
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback