Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6400-$79 171,457 User benchmarks, average bench 61% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	73.8% Very good	Memory 80.1 1-Core 105 2-Core 206 74% 131 Pts	4-Core 391 8-Core 388 52% 389 Pts	64-Core 401 25% 401 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 73.8% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 720 15,510 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Sapphire(174B 326B) 2GB CLim: 797 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 369.09 Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	3.06% Terrible	Lighting 3.7 Reflection 4 Parallax 3.7 3% 3.8 fps	MRender 4 Gravity 3.2 Splatting 4.2 3% 3.8 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.06% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 95GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0105A Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 495 Write 312 Mixed 368 87% 392 MB/s	4K Read 25.8 4K Write 63.2 4K Mixed 25.5 105% 38.2 MB/s	DQ Read 211 DQ Write 283 DQ Mixed 47.5 92% 180 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 2.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 146 154 158 159 159 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	63.2% Good	Read 90.3 Write 54.6 Mixed 60.5 SusWrite 130 62% 83.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0 55% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 63.2% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ACR16D3LU1KNG/8G Hynix HMT41GU6BFR8A-PB 16GB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	62.1% Good	MC Read 22.7 MC Write 23.2 MC Mixed 19.6 62% 21.8 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 23.2 SC Mixed 18.8 55% 19.3 GB/s	Latency 80.4 50% 80.4 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 62.1% Great: 62%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	116x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	47x
GeForce GT 720NvidiaBench 4%, 15,510 samples	33x

RAM
HMT41GU6BFR8A-PB 1x8GBHynixBench 29%, 9,029 samples	85x
ACR16D3LU1KNG/8G 2x8GBKingstonBench 53%, 1,171 samples	82x
ACR16D3LU1KNG/8G 1x8GBKingstonBench 29%, 2,154 samples	40x

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $79