Acer Aspire E1-572G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAcer Aspire E1-572G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer EA50_HW
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20140902
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 28 '21 at 04:43
Run Duration276 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU3%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4200U-$281
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Memory 62.6
1-Core 23.3
2-Core 43
31% 43 Pts
4-Core 62.8
8-Core 60.5
8% 61.7 Pts
64-Core 61.3
4% 61.3 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Acer(1025 0775) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.15.4248
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
0.59% Terrible
Lighting 0.6
Reflection 5.9
Parallax 1.2
0% 2.57 fps
MRender 1.6
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 0.9
1% 0.97 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 0.59%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingmax 120GB 120GB
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V4.15.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 382 301 256 319 365 350 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
65% Good
Read 434
Write 367
Mixed 320
SusWrite 329
81% 363 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 38.2
4K Mixed 12.1
72% 24.8 MB/s
DQ Read 178
DQ Write 118
DQ Mixed 30.3
54% 109 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 65%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LS1NBG/4G HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
27.9% Poor
MC Read 9.4
MC Write 8.7
MC Mixed 11.8
28% 9.97 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 7.5
18% 6.13 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire E1-572G Builds (Compare 566 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E1-572G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $281
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback