Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics21.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210105
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 30 '21 at 07:42
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 1200 Quad-Core
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
74.8% Very good
Memory 76.8
1-Core 106
2-Core 213
74% 132 Pts
4-Core 419
8-Core 424
56% 421 Pts
64-Core 427
26% 427 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500
CLim: 1196 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.10.2
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
21.8% Poor
Lighting 26.4
Reflection 28.2
Parallax 37.3
22% 30.6 fps
MRender 27.6
Gravity 29.4
Splatting 25.5
22% 27.5 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 21.8%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 120GB
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 398 185 82 81 82 82 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Read 486
Write 385
Mixed 345
SusWrite 152
76% 342 MB/s
4K Read 36.6
4K Write 79.7
4K Mixed 35.8
144% 50.7 MB/s
DQ Read 256
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 201
175% 258 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 94%
Seagate ST31000340NS 1TB-$95
931GB free
Firmware: XR1A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 102 103 102 104 100 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Read 107
Write 85.8
Mixed 51.6
SusWrite 102
63% 86.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
152% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 60%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 32GB
29GB free, PID 00ee
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.8 7.2 3.4 5.6 7 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
5.94% Terrible
Read 29.9
Write 12.5
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 5
14% 13 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
8% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.94%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G4D240FSB.16FBD BLS8G4D240FSB.16FBR2 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
MC Read 33.2
MC Write 32.7
MC Mixed 31.3
93% 32.4 GB/s
SC Read 27
SC Write 33.1
SC Mixed 27.7
84% 29.3 GB/s
Latency 86.6
46% 86.6 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,736 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $407
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback