Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 27% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	41% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium Dual T3200 2,188 User benchmarks, average bench 32% U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	26.5% Poor	Memory 45.8 1-Core 22.6 2-Core 44.3 25% 37.6 Pts	4-Core 44.3 8-Core 43 6% 43.7 Pts	64-Core 43.5 3% 43.5 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 26.5% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics Family 51 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Acer(1025 0176) Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 107.0.777.64 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.16% Terrible	Lighting 0.3 Reflection 0.5 Parallax 0.3 0% 0.37 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.16% Great: 0%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 79GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 132 77 91 100 69 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	41% Average	Read 221 Write 214 Mixed 190 SusWrite 111 41% 184 MB/s	4K Read 18.5 4K Write 24.2 4K Mixed 20.3 67% 21 MB/s	DQ Read 110 DQ Write 92.4 DQ Mixed 92.9 72% 98.3 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 41% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR2 Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	10.4% Very poor	MC Read 4.2 MC Write 2.9 MC Mixed 2.8 9% 3.3 GB/s	SC Read 2.8 SC Write 2.2 SC Mixed 3.1 8% 2.7 GB/s	Latency 177 23% 177 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.4% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 31%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium Dual T3200IntelBench 32%, 2,188 samples	11x
Pentium T4200Intel $99Bench 34%, 5,474 samples	8x
Core2 Duo T5800IntelBench 34%, 3,175 samples	4x

GPU
Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset FamilyIntelBench 0%, 23,924 samples	30x
Intel 45 Express Chipset FamilyMobileBench 1%, 2,404 samples	3x
Intel 45 Express Chipset FamilyMobileBench 0%, 716 samples	1x