Asus P8H61-M LX2 R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8H61-M LX2 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory1.8 GB free of 3 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20131127
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 31 '21 at 17:23
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User VEN-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron G1610-$37
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
56.9% Above average
Memory 91
1-Core 71.5
2-Core 140
62% 101 Pts
4-Core 136
8-Core 139
18% 137 Pts
64-Core 145
9% 145 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
Asus(1043 844D) 1.5GB
Driver: igdumdim32.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4276
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.37% Terrible
Lighting 1.5
Reflection 1
Parallax 1.4
1% 1.3 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 2
2% 2.07 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.37%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST320LM001 HN-M320MBB 320GB
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2AR10002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 56 45 54 54 57 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
34% Below average
Read 65.4
Write 68.8
Mixed 44
SusWrite 52.6
42% 57.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.5
110% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 34%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 857F 1GB 1333MHZ NANYA 3GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 1024 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.3% Average
MC Read 13.9
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 13.2
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 12.8
35% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 65.8
61% 65.8 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H61-M LX2 R2.0 Builds (Compare 554 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M LX2 R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback