Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 7

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive243% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 7  (all builds)
Memory25.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170808
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 23 '17 at 16:27
Run Duration257 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7820X-$195
, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
Memory 76.5
1-Core 127
2-Core 270
85% 158 Pts
4-Core 571
8-Core 1,007
95% 789 Pts
64-Core 1,614
100% 1,614 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 92%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
464GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 411
Mixed 417
99% 445 MB/s
4K Read 34.8
4K Write 50.9
4K Mixed 43.2
135% 43 MB/s
DQ Read 320
DQ Write 243
DQ Mixed 117
132% 227 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 100%
Great: 134%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$128
424GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
243% Outstanding
Read 1,985
Write 1,747
Mixed 1,669
401% 1,800 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 50.3
4K Mixed 38.8
118% 38.8 MB/s
DQ Read 563
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 167
201% 356 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 243%
Great: 353%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$66
1TB free
Firmware: CC41 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
83.6% Excellent
Read 120
Write 170
Mixed 108
99% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.69
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 0.78
212% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 110%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$66
1TB free
Firmware: CC41 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Read 113
Write 188
Mixed 149
113% 150 MB/s
4K Read 0.75
4K Write 5.28
4K Mixed 0.82
221% 2.29 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 110%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$66
1TB free
Firmware: CC41 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
Read 124
Write 191
Mixed 143
115% 152 MB/s
4K Read 0.64
4K Write 5.18
4K Mixed 0.8
211% 2.21 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 110%
H/W DISK 2 3TB
3TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Read 172
Write 190
Mixed 124
206% 162 MB/s
4K Read 0.75
4K Write 1.85
4K Mixed 0.23
74% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 72%
H/W DISK 1 3TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
66.9% Good
Read 176
Write 166
Mixed 68.5
165% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.56
4K Write 1.61
4K Mixed 0.18
63% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 60%
H/W DISK 3 2TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
49.8% Average
Read 120
Write 109
Mixed 104
141% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1.19
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.35
108% 1.41 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 44%
H/W DISK 4 2TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
47.8% Average
Read 116
Write 106
Mixed 70.3
120% 97.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.92
4K Write 2.47
4K Mixed 0.27
96% 1.22 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
MC Read 28.1
MC Write 54.3
MC Mixed 27.2
104% 36.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 22.5
SC Mixed 9.6
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 87.3
46% 87.3 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 7 Builds (Compare 376 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $759
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback