Today's hottest deals

Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics39% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150212
Uptime15.2 Days
Run DateNov 02 '21 at 21:52
Run Duration219 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$85
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
65.9% Good
Memory 86.4
1-Core 70.9
2-Core 128
59% 94.9 Pts
4-Core 248
8-Core 351
38% 299 Pts
64-Core 404
25% 404 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 380X-$120
CLim: 1040 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
39% Below average
Lighting 50.4
Reflection 47.9
Parallax 63.5
41% 53.9 fps
MRender 47.4
Gravity 50.9
Splatting 33.8
35% 44 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 39%
Great: 40%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 240GB-$70
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: XD0R00G2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 343 367 370 370 169 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
79.3% Very good
Read 405
Write 389
Mixed 342
SusWrite 328
82% 366 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 59.6
4K Mixed 32.4
110% 38.8 MB/s
DQ Read 150
DQ Write 244
DQ Mixed 196
149% 197 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 99%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
406GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 156 158 158 160 160 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
97.1% Outstanding
Read 180
Write 151
Mixed 82
SusWrite 158
104% 143 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
238% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 97.1%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1866C9D3/4GX KHX1866C9D3/4GX 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.6% Below average
MC Read 10.5
MC Write 10.3
MC Mixed 10.2
30% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 9.5
24% 8.53 GB/s
Latency 71
56% 71 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 586 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0 - $166

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $467
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $288WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback