Today's hottest deals

HP ZBook Studio G5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.68% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive187% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (71%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP ZBook Studio G5  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8427
Memory25.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210805
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 03 '21 at 03:18
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 71%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E-2176M
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
62.2% Good
Memory 65.6
1-Core 59.1
2-Core 176
55% 100 Pts
4-Core 346
8-Core 310
45% 328 Pts
64-Core 383
24% 383 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics P630
HP(103C 8427) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8854
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
5.68% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 36.1
Parallax 8.5
5% 17 fps
MRender 6.2
Gravity 7.4
Splatting 10.2
7% 7.93 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.68%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB1T0HBLR-000H1 1TB
626GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS0NEXF
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1084 964 1225 1086 1192 1246 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
187% Outstanding
Read 1,189
Write 1,165
Mixed 1,140
SusWrite 1,133
261% 1,157 MB/s
4K Read 44.9
4K Write 67.6
4K Mixed 40.9
156% 51.1 MB/s
DQ Read 609
DQ Write 432
DQ Mixed 554
405% 532 MB/s
Poor: 155%
This bench: 187%
Great: 333%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAA4GS6MJR8N-VK 1x31GB
1 of 2 slots used
31GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
36.4% Below average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 12
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 9.7
SC Mixed 8
23% 7.93 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ZBook Studio G5 Builds (Compare 865 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: HP ZBook Studio G5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback