Today's hottest deals

Asus M4A87TD EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics27.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M4A87TD EVO  (all builds)
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110308
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 23 '17 at 21:32
Run Duration733 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 B60
AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Memory 89.9
1-Core 48.6
2-Core 96.6
52% 78.4 Pts
4-Core 144
8-Core 188
21% 166 Pts
64-Core 191
12% 191 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Gigabyte(1458 3643) 2GB
CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 384.76
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
27.5% Poor
Lighting 31.9
Reflection 29
Parallax 37.2
26% 32.7 fps
MRender 40.6
Gravity 38.8
Splatting 33.3
30% 37.6 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M4 128GB-$116
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 040H Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
50.9% Above average
Read 378
Write 185
Mixed 200
56% 255 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 72.2
4K Mixed 4.56
79% 33.3 MB/s
DQ Read 28.1
DQ Write 93.5
DQ Mixed 4.93
20% 42.2 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 72%
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
23GB free
Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 515
Write 388
Mixed 409
97% 437 MB/s
4K Read 44.5
4K Write 94.1
4K Mixed 42.6
172% 60.4 MB/s
DQ Read 269
DQ Write 199
DQ Mixed 96.6
109% 188 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 107%
Great: 115%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$77
1.5TB free
Firmware: 82.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 146
Mixed 141
116% 155 MB/s
4K Read 0.85
4K Write 2.71
4K Mixed 0.3
119% 1.29 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 86%
Seagate ST2000VM003-1CT164 2TB
913GB free
Firmware: SC23 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
76.7% Very good
Read 145
Write 123
Mixed 100
92% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1.13
4K Mixed 0.15
56% 0.58 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 100%
ST3000DM 001-1CH166 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Read 19.8
Write 18.2
Mixed 10.5
20% 16.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.72
4K Write 1.42
4K Mixed 0.22
59% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 69%
ST3000DM 008-2DM166 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Read 19.7
Write 19
Mixed 11.5
21% 16.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.76
4K Write 1.64
4K Mixed 0.24
67% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 57%
ST3000DM 001-1ER166 3TB
892GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
12% Very poor
Read 19.7
Write 18.1
Mixed 9.71
19% 15.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.69
4K Write 1.64
4K Mixed 0.25
67% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12%
Great: 69%
Kingston DT 100 G2 16GB
5GB free, PID 1653
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
5.12% Terrible
Read 21.3
Write 8.98
Mixed 9.88
15% 13.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.03
4K Write 0.02
4K Mixed 0.007
1% 0.02 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.12%
Great: 8%
USB DISK 2.0 32GB
3GB free, PID 9917
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
5.83% Terrible
Read 26
Write 4.46
Mixed 5.9
11% 12.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.82
4K Write 0.06
4K Mixed 0.04
18% 1.31 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.83%
Great: 10%
ST3000DM 001-1CH166 3TB
1GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
9.34% Terrible
Read 21.1
Write 17.8
Mixed 14.2
22% 17.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.27
4K Write 0.76
4K Mixed 0.24
35% 0.42 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 9.34%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 16GB
800, 800, 800, 800 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
34.5% Below average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 7.6
MC Mixed 12.7
33% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 9.6
22% 7.8 GB/s
Latency 67.3
59% 67.3 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4A87TD EVO Builds (Compare 139 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M4A87TD EVO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $238
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback