Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506QM_FX506QM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics95.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506QM_FX506QM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FA506QM
Memory22.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kleuren, 1280 x 800 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210602
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateNov 04 '21 at 10:11
Run Duration209 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
Memory 81.1
1-Core 144
2-Core 282
92% 169 Pts
4-Core 548
8-Core 935
90% 741 Pts
64-Core 1,359
84% 1,359 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 97%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
Asus(1043 16A2) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.10.2
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
20% Very poor
Lighting 25.6
Reflection 22.2
Parallax 34.6
21% 27.5 fps
MRender 15.9
Gravity 27.5
Splatting 22.8
18% 22.1 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 20%
Great: 21%
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop)
Asus(1043 16A2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2197 MHz, MLim: 3575 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 496.49
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
95.9% Outstanding
Lighting 124
Reflection 173
Parallax 118
101% 138 fps
MRender 138
Gravity 96.7
Splatting 86.9
85% 107 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 95.9%
Great: 105%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFM512GD3JX013N 512GB
130GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 41000C20
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,338
Write 2,302
Mixed 1,732
473% 2,124 MB/s
4K Read 50.1
4K Write 93
4K Mixed 63.7
207% 68.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,007
DQ Write 619
DQ Mixed 849
623% 825 MB/s
Poor: 118% Great: 313%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
89GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 31 28 28 28 27 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
17% Very poor
Read 37.7
Write 33.5
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 28.2
8% 33.8 MB/s
4K Read 12.3
4K Write 12.9
4K Mixed 12.1
41% 12.4 MB/s
DQ Read 24.2
DQ Write 21.9
DQ Mixed 16.2
14% 20.8 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 17%
Great: 108%
General U Disk 1TB
971GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8 4.5 7.3 7.2 7.6 9 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
7.66% Terrible
Read 25.9
Write 8.5
Mixed 26.7
SusWrite 7.2
21% 17.1 MB/s
4K Read 9.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.5
54% 3.47 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.66%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C22 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
84.3% Excellent
MC Read 29.7
MC Write 28
MC Mixed 28.7
82% 28.8 GB/s
SC Read 26.3
SC Write 41.6
SC Mixed 30
93% 32.6 GB/s
Latency 78.5
51% 78.5 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506QM_FX506QM Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506QM_FX506QM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback