Today's hottest deals

Asus P8P67

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics73.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8P67  (all builds)
Memory7.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110310
Uptime7.2 Days
Run DateNov 07 '21 at 21:06
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 38%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
65.6% Good
Memory 84.1
1-Core 83.5
2-Core 148
64% 105 Pts
4-Core 258
8-Core 356
39% 307 Pts
64-Core 382
24% 382 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$218
CLim: 2265 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
73.3% Very good
Lighting 90.7
Reflection 93.6
Parallax 85.1
74% 89.8 fps
MRender 112
Gravity 82.5
Splatting 75.9
72% 90.3 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 120GB-$49
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 444
Write 362
Mixed 7.7
59% 271 MB/s
4K Read 6.7
4K Write 35.2
4K Mixed 1.1
30% 14.3 MB/s
DQ Read 173
DQ Write 18.9
DQ Mixed 25.2
36% 72.4 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 86%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$80
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 45 39 40 37 36 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
28.3% Poor
Read 59.1
Write 78.1
Mixed 23.5
SusWrite 39.7
36% 50.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
56% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Sniper DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
43.3% Average
MC Read 15
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 13.8
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 13.4
37% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 73.3
54% 73.3 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 Builds (Compare 1,552 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 - $120

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $666
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback