Today's hottest deals

Asus F1A75

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus F1A75  (all builds)
Memory14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140526
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 10 '21 at 02:38
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User TTO-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-3670 APU
FM1 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
51.8% Above average
Memory 74.7
1-Core 41.9
2-Core 84.8
44% 67.1 Pts
4-Core 170
8-Core 169
23% 170 Pts
64-Core 170
10% 170 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 200
PowerColor(148C 5230) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
1.6% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 2.4
Parallax 2
2% 2.13 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 1.9
2% 1.9 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.6%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 240GB
179GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM
SusWrite @10s intervals: 309 98 78 107 125 98 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
53.4% Above average
Read 313
Write 72.7
Mixed 196
SusWrite 136
40% 179 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 32.8
4K Mixed 19.8
72% 24 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 246
DQ Mixed 176
148% 215 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 95%
Seagate ST1000DM 010-2EP102 1TB
858GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 104 107 102 105 106 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Read 187
Write 141
Mixed 89.2
SusWrite 105
96% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
165% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5584-007.A00LF Adata 76.B146G.C0K0C Adata 16GB
1333, 1600, 1333, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.9% Below average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 11.9
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 8.5
20% 7.07 GB/s
Latency 90.9
44% 90.9 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F1A75 Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F1A75

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback