Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 2359CTO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.58% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemLenovo 2359CTO  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 2359CTO
Memory8.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190327
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 10 '21 at 03:00
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3840QM-$549
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
68.2% Good
Memory 81.3
1-Core 93.1
2-Core 157
66% 110 Pts
4-Core 305
8-Core 396
45% 350 Pts
64-Core 473
29% 473 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Legend(17AA 21F5) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5059
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.58% Terrible
Lighting 4.4
Reflection 6.9
Parallax 3.2
4% 4.83 fps
MRender 4.4
Gravity 2.7
Splatting 5.5
4% 4.2 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.58%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
217GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 421 396 317 284 267 236 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
85% Excellent
Read 474
Write 406
Mixed 379
SusWrite 320
89% 395 MB/s
4K Read 36.5
4K Write 21.1
4K Mixed 33.9
110% 30.5 MB/s
DQ Read 334
DQ Write 213
DQ Mixed 267
201% 272 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 85%
Great: 134%
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
196GB free
Firmware: SBFKJ3A3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 409 412 416 383 421 420 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
76.7% Very good
Read 369
Write 391
Mixed 338
SusWrite 410
85% 377 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 40
4K Mixed 25.6
88% 29.4 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 208
DQ Mixed 184
147% 205 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73BH0-CK0 M471B5173BH0-CK0 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30.5% Below average
MC Read 10.9
MC Write 9.3
MC Mixed 8.8
28% 9.67 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 10.7
SC Mixed 9.9
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 78.2
51% 78.2 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 2359CTO Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 2359CTO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 27% - Poor Total price: $85
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback