Today's hottest deals

Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409DAP_M409DA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409DAP_M409DA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X409DAP
Memory0.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210409
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateNov 11 '21 at 12:57
Run Duration227 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon Silver 3050U Graphics
FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
29.5% Poor
Memory 34.5
1-Core 68.2
2-Core 128
42% 76.9 Pts
4-Core 135
8-Core 174
20% 155 Pts
64-Core 170
10% 170 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Asus(1043 10A2) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.10.2
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
1.54% Terrible
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 3.4
Parallax 1.9
1% 2.23 fps
MRender 2.5
Gravity 1.4
Splatting 4.1
2% 2.67 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.54%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme 128GB 128GB
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1102A0L Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 259 247 252 74 93 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
79.5% Very good
Read 575
Write 448
Mixed 433
SusWrite 182
91% 410 MB/s
4K Read 34.3
4K Write 77.1
4K Mixed 19.8
118% 43.7 MB/s
DQ Read 339
DQ Write 152
DQ Mixed 175
149% 222 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 170%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
461GB free
Firmware: 04.01A04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 102 106 109 107 111 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
69.2% Good
Read 135
Write 39.8
Mixed 40.3
SusWrite 106
59% 80.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
144% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (85th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.5% Below average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 13.9
MC Mixed 13.4
41% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 7.4
SC Mixed 8.3
21% 7.47 GB/s
Latency 229
17% 229 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409DAP_M409DA Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409DAP_M409DA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $240Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $365
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback