Asus Z9NA-D6C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (90%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAsus Z9NA-D6C  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Z9NA-D6C
Memory22.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, , 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131108
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 11 '21 at 18:05
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 90%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2403 0
Socket-B2 1356, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
41.2% Average
Memory 66.8
1-Core 47.5
2-Core 90.7
43% 68.3 Pts
4-Core 92.6
8-Core 94.8
12% 93.7 Pts
64-Core 89.9
6% 89.9 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8400 GS
Asus(1043 8402) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.01
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.01% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 1.1
Parallax 0.3
1% 0.83 fps
MRender 2.5
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.6
1% 1.53 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 1.01%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 512GB
434GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 235 94 91 95 92 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
62.8% Good
Read 444
Write 280
Mixed 330
SusWrite 159
68% 303 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 45
4K Mixed 24.6
90% 30.9 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 136
DQ Mixed 173
128% 171 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 102%
Mushkin ECO2 480GB
447GB free
Firmware: 603ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 164 130 128 106 129 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
50.6% Above average
Read 412
Write 225
Mixed 254
SusWrite 135
57% 257 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 16.4
4K Mixed 18
62% 18.1 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 83.8
DQ Mixed 106
90% 137 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT151R7BFR4C-H 6x4GB
6 of 6 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.1% Poor
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 8.9
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 4.8
15% 5.4 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z9NA-D6C Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Asus Z9NA-D6C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 11% - Very poor Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback