Rausch 520012

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (95th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 5 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemRausch 520012  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro H12SSW-NT
Memory123.3 GB free of 128 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201125
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 11 '21 at 23:32
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD EPYC 7302P 16-Core
CPU, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
75.7% Very good
Memory 63.7
1-Core 117
2-Core 235
74% 138 Pts
4-Core 469
8-Core 940
83% 704 Pts
64-Core 2,363
146% 2,363 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 77%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Avago MR9440-8i 1TB
894GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 877 933 938 935 640 1004 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 39% Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2K43DB3-CWE 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
246% Outstanding
MC Read 108
MC Write 79.8
MC Mixed 123
296% 103 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 30.9
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 246%
Great: 246%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback