Lenovo 3269A8U

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.78% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive46.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemLenovo 3269A8U  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110215
Uptime3.5 Days
Run DateNov 12 '21 at 01:46
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 99%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 650-$70
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
49.8% Average
Memory 67.2
1-Core 79.5
2-Core 132
55% 92.8 Pts
4-Core 190
8-Core 181
25% 186 Pts
64-Core 188
12% 188 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2000
HP(103C 094C) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
6.78% Terrible
Lighting 7.5
Reflection 10.2
Parallax 10.1
6% 9.27 fps
MRender 11.2
Gravity 10
Splatting 8.9
8% 10 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 6.78%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400S37960G 960GB
650GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKK1B3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 196 192 191 194 192 MB/s
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
46.4% Average
Read 203
Write 186
Mixed 175
SusWrite 194
43% 190 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 37.3
4K Mixed 23.3
78% 26.5 MB/s
DQ Read 26.8
DQ Write 64.8
DQ Mixed 34.1
29% 41.9 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 102%
Seagate ST3500414CS 500GB
391GB free
Firmware: CA14
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 54 55 55 55 56 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
43.6% Average
Read 97.1
Write 98.9
Mixed 53.3
SusWrite 54.6
56% 76 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
164% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 M378B5773CH0-CH9 Micron 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 M378B5773CH0-CH9 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29.8% Poor
MC Read 9.8
MC Write 8.9
MC Mixed 12.7
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 7.3
21% 7.2 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 3269A8U Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 3269A8U

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $174
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback