Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	50.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Very high background CPU (77%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-5750M APU 4,247 User benchmarks, average bench 41% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 0.95 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	32.9% Below average	Memory 58 1-Core 36.1 2-Core 33.7 31% 42.6 Pts	4-Core 46.4 8-Core 57.2 7% 51.8 Pts	64-Core 64.8 4% 64.8 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 32.9% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 74GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 86 121 129 84 89 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	50.4% Above average	Read 328 Write 252 Mixed 225 SusWrite 119 52% 231 MB/s	4K Read 15.3 4K Write 31.7 4K Mixed 22 68% 23 MB/s	DQ Read 247 DQ Write 135 DQ Mixed 119 108% 167 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 50.4% Great: 108%
Hitachi Touro Mobile 3.0 1TB 925 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 583GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 28 27 28 28 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	31.9% Below average	Read 83.5 Write 23.9 Mixed 30.2 SusWrite 27.9 30% 41.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.4 73% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 31.9% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT102464BF186D.M16 CT8G3S186DM.C16FN 16GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 933, 933 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	29.3% Poor	MC Read 14.5 MC Write 6 MC Mixed 11.1 30% 10.5 GB/s	SC Read 6 SC Write 5.3 SC Mixed 9.6 20% 6.97 GB/s	Latency 134 30% 134 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 29.3% Great: 35%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 39%

Jet ski

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

RAM
M471B5273EB0-CK0 M471B5273EB0-CK0 8GBSamsungBench 28%, 329 samples	8x
CT102464BF186D.M16 CT8G3S186DM.C16FN 16GBUnknownBench 33%, 7 samples	4x
M471B5273DH0-CK0 M471B5273DH0-CK0 8GBSamsungBench 31%, 243 samples	4x

Value: 18% - Very poor

Total price: $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16