Samsung R430/R480/R440

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemSamsung R430/R480/R440  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG R430/R480/R440
Memory2.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100525
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 12 '21 at 13:42
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 M 460-$130
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
43.1% Average
Memory 66.7
1-Core 70.3
2-Core 117
51% 84.6 Pts
4-Core 108
8-Core 154
16% 131 Pts
64-Core 110
7% 110 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C551) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2993
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.43% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 1
0% 0.97 fps
MRender 1.5
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 1.2
1% 1.17 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.43%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MK1265GSX H 120GB
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GJ003A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 64 64 65 63 65 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
37.8% Below average
Read 67.1
Write 59.6
Mixed 23.4
SusWrite 64.5
39% 53.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
117% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SH564568FH8NZPHSCR 80CE M471B5673FH0-CF8 4GB
667, 533 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
23.9% Poor
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 9.5
23% 8.03 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 6.6
18% 6.43 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 24%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical R430/R480/R440 Builds (Compare 29 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung R430/R480/R440

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Average Total price: $130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback