HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0013dx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive132% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0013dx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 86D4
Memory16.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201221
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateNov 13 '21 at 05:43
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
40% Average
Memory 34.5
1-Core 62.3
2-Core 129
40% 75.4 Pts
4-Core 244
8-Core 401
39% 322 Pts
64-Core 381
24% 381 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 40%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
HP(103C 86D4) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.40.54.01
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.08% Terrible
Lighting 2.5
Reflection 36.5
Parallax 3.9
2% 14.3 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 2.8
Splatting 2.3
2% 2.7 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 2.08%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ256HAJD-000H1 256GB
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2NFXV
SusWrite @10s intervals: 731 835 865 615 188 189 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
132% Outstanding
Read 1,065
Write 852
Mixed 785
SusWrite 570
183% 818 MB/s
4K Read 32
4K Write 66.1
4K Mixed 35.8
129% 44.6 MB/s
DQ Read 360
DQ Write 311
DQ Mixed 358
262% 343 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 132%
Great: 192%
WDC WDS100T2G0A-00JH30 1TB
680GB free
Firmware: UH450400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 252 222 186 211 184 215 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
45% Average
Read 389
Write 332
Mixed 160
SusWrite 212
61% 273 MB/s
4K Read 11.9
4K Write 23.7
4K Mixed 7.4
40% 14.3 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 100
DQ Mixed 32.9
45% 82.7 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 45%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6DJR8N-VK CT16G4SFD824A.C16FE 24GB
2667, 2400 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
26.8% Poor
MC Read 7.4
MC Write 7.4
MC Mixed 13.6
27% 9.47 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 7.4
SC Mixed 11.4
25% 8.77 GB/s
Latency 230
17% 230 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 27%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0013dx Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0013dx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback