PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 39.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 22.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock H61M-VG3 (all builds) |
Memory | 6.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores, |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20130711 |
Uptime | 0.6 Days |
Run Date | Nov 13 '21 at 11:20 |
Run Duration | 166 Seconds |
Run User | PRT-User |
Background CPU | 31% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
|
59.4%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
39.1%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
SSD240GM7B 240GB
138GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0831B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 191 11 21 26 28 MB/s
|
22.7%
Poor
|
|||
Toshiba HDWD105 500GB-$49
100GB free
Firmware: MS1OA8J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 89 84 94 95 94 MB/s
|
59.5%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston 99U5474-026.A00LF KHX1600C9D3/8GX 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
|
25.4%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i3-3240IntelBench 55%, 37,789 samples | 108x |
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 93x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 93x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 209x |
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 63x |
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 49x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 21% - Poor | Total price: $83 |