HP EliteBook 8770w

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.44% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP EliteBook 8770w  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 176C
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161007
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 14 '21 at 14:31
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
65% Good
Memory 76.9
1-Core 88.5
2-Core 173
65% 113 Pts
4-Core 290
8-Core 397
44% 344 Pts
64-Core 428
26% 428 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 65%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K3000M
HP(103C 176C) 2GB
CLim: 653 MHz, MLim: 700 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 425.31
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
7.44% Terrible
Lighting 8
Reflection 11.2
Parallax 11.2
6% 10.1 fps
MRender 12.6
Gravity 11.2
Splatting 10.4
9% 11.4 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.44%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
168GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 452 438 412 345 346 347 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
98.9% Outstanding
Read 480
Write 448
Mixed 420
SusWrite 390
98% 435 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 60.4
4K Mixed 38.7
126% 42.9 MB/s
DQ Read 391
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 363
273% 366 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 128%
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125
294GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GH2OA440
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 77 74 92 101 101 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
49.1% Average
Read 81.4
Write 94.2
Mixed 35.6
SusWrite 89.4
55% 75.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.4
103% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 72%
USB Flash Disk 32GB
29GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 12 11 12 11 12 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
6.21% Terrible
Read 20.6
Write 20.7
Mixed 10
SusWrite 12.3
21% 15.9 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.4
22% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.21%
Great: 27%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 Kingston 9905428-102.A00G 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
49.9% Average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 15.9
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 15
SC Mixed 15.1
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 86.5
46% 86.5 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 8770w Builds (Compare 569 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8770w

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback