Today's hottest deals

Asus M32CD4-K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics38.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus M32CD4-K  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK M32CD4-K
Memory2.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170106
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateNov 14 '21 at 16:21
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
72% Very good
Memory 74.4
1-Core 100
2-Core 202
70% 125 Pts
4-Core 411
8-Core 353
52% 382 Pts
64-Core 397
25% 397 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 72%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$295
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 496.49
Relative performance (0th percentile)
38.6% Below average
Lighting 71.8
Reflection 74.2
Parallax 71.2
58% 72.4 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SBAT128G1002 128GB
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z2317002
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 321
Write 154
Mixed 167
47% 214 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 65.5
4K Mixed 12
77% 31.7 MB/s
DQ Read 161
DQ Write 163
DQ Mixed 73.2
79% 132 MB/s
Poor: 43% Great: 69%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
100GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 147 119 133 160 129 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Read 156
Write 158
Mixed 75.6
SusWrite 138
96% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
152% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A5244CB0-CRC Hynix HMA851U6AFR6N-UH 8GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
52.2% Above average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 17.8
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 6
28% 9.8 GB/s
Latency 91.5
44% 91.5 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M32CD4-K Builds (Compare 726 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Asus M32CD4-K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $171
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback