Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	28.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700-$167 256,717 User benchmarks, average bench 76% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	83.7% Excellent	Memory 91.9 1-Core 124 2-Core 243 86% 153 Pts	4-Core 407 8-Core 692 67% 549 Pts	64-Core 658 41% 658 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 83.7% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 3510) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.68 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	28.5% Poor	Lighting 35.8 Reflection 39 Parallax 37.5 29% 37.4 fps	MRender 37.6 Gravity 37.8 Splatting 26.7 27% 34 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 28.5% Great: 33%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 1GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.01A01 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 91.1 Write 95.5 Mixed 52.6 59% 79.7 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1.1 205% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Ramaxel RMUA5110MB78HAF2400 04CB 16GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2400, 2667 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	74.1% Very good	MC Read 27.9 MC Write 28.2 MC Mixed 22.1 74% 26.1 GB/s	SC Read 17.4 SC Write 27.2 SC Mixed 22.6 64% 22.4 GB/s	Latency 64.3 62% 64.3 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 74.1% Great: 74%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 29%

Raft

Desktop 83%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 25%

Raft

CPU
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	8x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	5x
RTX 2060S (Super)Nvidia $510Bench 100%, 319,148 samples	1x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	1x

RAM
RMUA5110MB78HAF2400 Kingston 99U5702-089.A00G 16GBRamaxelBench 76%, 2 samples	2x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 97%, 6,687 samples	1x
RMUA5110MB78HAF2400 1x8GBRamaxelBench 39%, 1,049 samples	1x

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $292

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16